However, the above observation is without prejudice towards the legal rights from the parties, arising out of your over marriage of the pair, if any, pending before the competent court of law. Read more
The main objectives of police is to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and over all ensure regulation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The law enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that can be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but just isn't binding precedent.
13. The Supreme Court has held that once the act of misconduct is proven and also the employee is found guilty after due process of legislation, it is the prerogative with the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the varied penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not proportionate with the seriousness with the act of misconduct is not really ample though the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a very structured and lawful method. Read more
Although there isn't any prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds little sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent from the home state, relevant case regulation from another state might be deemed because of the court.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice from the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford a possibility of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to contemplate all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal website regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the legislation when it really is unclear how it relates to any presented situation, typically rendering judgments based within the intent of lawmakers as well as the circumstances in the case at hand. This sort of decisions become a guide for long term similar cases.
Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common regulation, is usually a regulation that is based on precedents, that is the judicial decisions from previous cases, rather than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by regulation." It is nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are classified as the opinions that are filed on the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and are sometimes not the court's final opinion.
Any court might seek out to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to succeed in a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to a higher court.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Criminal cases In the common regulation tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Not like most civil regulation systems, common legislation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decrease courts should make decisions reliable with the previous decisions of higher courts.